Allowed
National Insu. v. Sangita Devi
Himachal Pradesh HCCMP/1144/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in FAO No.266/1993 01.04.2016 Present: Mr.…
What the court decided
AI extract
in FAO No.266/1993 01.04.2016 Present: Mr.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.1144/2016 in FAO No.266/1993
01.04.2016 Present:
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate for the applicant/respondents.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate for the nonapplicant/appellant.
According to learned counsel for the applicant, the judgment has attained finality. Learned counsel for the non-applicant has no objection for release of the amount, as such, application is allowed and amount falling to the share of the applicant, alongwith up-to-date interest, is directed to be released in his favour.
The amount be remitted directly into the bank account as per particulars mentioned in the application. Application stands disposed of.
April 1, 2016 (K S) (Sanjay Karol), J.
Applicant/Respondents
Nonapplicant/Appellant
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court