Satya Devi v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous without substantive adjudication on the merits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No.2050 of 2012-E Date of Decision: 05.03.2015
Satya Devi ………Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & others. …..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner: Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. R.S. Verma, Addl. AG., and Mr.R.M. Bisht, Dy. AG., for respondents No.1 to 4 and 6, Advocate.
Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Sanjay Karol, J (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that present petition becomes infructuous. As such, present petition stands disposed of, having become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satya Devi
- respondent
State of H.P.
Coram
Sanjay Karol
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/2050/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court