Single judge order in criminal revision petition disapproveding lower court's refusal to allow one last witness examination, directing trial court to afford final opportunity and fixing hearing date.
Trial court to fix date for examination of one witness; petitioner to pay costs of ₹1000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CMPMO No.241 of 2012 Date of Decision: 04.03.2015
Liyakat Ali alias Chura Khan …Petitioner.
Versus
Nazir through his LRs. ..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Garuav Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Sanjay Karol, J (oral)
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Court is of the considered view that interest of justice would be met, if last and final opportunity, is afforded to the petitioner for adducing evidence and examine one witness. As such, present petition is disposed of with the following directions:-
1. Hearing is expedited.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol), March 4, 2015 Judge. (Purohit)
Liyakat Ali alias Chura Khan
Nazir
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
