The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Civil Revision No. 128 of 2014 as withdrawn by the petitioner. The court clarified that limitation would not bar a subsequent appeal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; leave reserved for filing appeal within limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Civil Revision No. 128 of 2014
Decided on : 7.4.2015
Des Raj …..Petitioner. Versus Satish Chand ….Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. R.K Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Leena Guleria, Advocate.
Sureshwar Thakur, J (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, limitation, if any shall not stand in the way of the petitioner in preferring an appeal before the Court of Competent jurisdiction.
Copy dasti.
7th April, 2015 ( Sureshwar Thakur ), (priti) Judge.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Des Raj
Satish Chand
Sureshwar Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
