The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed a writ petition as having become infructuous due to the efflux of time, without addressing the substantive reliefs sought.
No relief granted; writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 5140 of 2014
Date of decision: 08.12.2014
Mohit Sharma.
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others.
….. Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan, Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr.Ashok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.4.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)
Mr. Surinder Saklani, learned counsel for the petitioner, stated at the Bar that the reliefs sought in the writ petition have become redundant by efflux of time, rendering the writ petition as infructuous. His Statement is taken on record.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice December 08, 2014 ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) (rkv) Judge
Mohit Sharma
State of Himachal Pradesh
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
