The High Court of Himachal Pradesh, in a civil writ petition, followed its prior decision in Sanjay Kumar and quashed a departmental order transferring the petitioner.
The transfer order dated 21.06.2014 qua the petitioner was quashed and set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 4324 of 2014.
| Date of Decision:05.08.2014. | |
|---|---|
| Rajeev Chaudhary | …. Petitioner. |
| Vs. | |
| State of H.P and another | …. Respondents. |
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.
Whether approved for Reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondent No. 1: Mr. Anup Rattan, Addl. A.G..
Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral):
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the transfer of the petitioner is based on a D.O. letter. This averment has not been denied in the reply.
any.
( Rajiv Sharma ) Judge.
5th August, 2014. (Sureshwar Thakur) (TM) Judge.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer order based on a D.O. letter without denial in reply is liable to be quashed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sanjay Kumar vs. State of H.P. and othersFollowed¶10
CWP No. 801 of 2013 titled as Sanjay Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others
Rajeev Chaudhary
State of H.P.
Rajiv Sharma
Sureshwar Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
