The petition, filed as a civil writ petition, was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file a representation. The court granted permission for withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3735 of 2014.
Date of Decision : 4th August, 2014.
Chaman Lal …..Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & others …..Respondents. Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate General.
_______________________________________________________
Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral)
Heard. Mr. Maan Singh, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a representation to respondents-State. Permission granted. The Respondents-State shall consider the representation in accordance with law and shall decide the same within 10 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.
‘ (Rajiv Sharma) Judge (Sureshwar Thakur) 4th August, 2014 Judge. (jai)
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Chaman Lal
State of H.P.
Rajiv Sharma
Sureshwar Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
