Shyam Lal v. H.P.S.E.B
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a writ petition declaring a suspension order invalid after it expired due to failure to review within 90 days as mandated by CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.
What did the court decide?
Suspension order dated 12.7.2013 declared invalid on expiry of 90 days; pending application disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. : 2794 of 2014 Reserved on : 24.7.2014
Decided on: 1.8. 2014
Shyam Lal. …Petitioner.
Versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and other.
…Respondents.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner : Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Richa Sharma, Advocate.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a suspension order remains valid after the expiry of 90 days without prior review under Rule 10 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.
Whether a subsequent review conducted after the expiry of 90 days can revive an already invalid suspension order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shyam Lal
- respondent
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited
Coram
Rajiv Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/2794/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court