The High Court of Himachal Pradesh issued a direction to the respondent to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding regularization of services within eight weeks, providing an opportunity of hearing.
Direction to respondent to decide the pending representation within eight weeks with a hearing opportunity and reasons if unfavorable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 3092 of 2013-I
Date of Decision : May 2 , 2014
Anokhu Ram …Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation & ans. … Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral)
CMP No. 5701 of 2014
Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, petition is heard today itself.
CWP No. 3092 of 2013
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
With the aforesaid observations, petition is disposed of, as also the pending application(s), if any.
May 2 , 2014 (PK)
(Sanjay Karol), Judge.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent authority should be directed to decide the petitioner's pending representation expeditiously within eight weeks.
Anokhu Ram
Himachal Road Transport Corporation
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
