Madan Lal v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MP(M)…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MP(M)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Cr.MP(M) No.20/2014 Decided on : February, 24, 2014 Madan Lal …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate.
For the Respondent : Mr. M.L. Chauhan, Addl. A.G. and Mr. R.S. Verma, Addl. A.G.
Justice Sanjay Karol, J . (oral)
P.S.I. Ankur Sharma, Police Station, Kullu, District Kullu, is present alongwith record. Status report taken on record in Cr.MP(M) No.19/2014.
At this stage, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petition has become infructuous. As such, petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
February 24, 2014 (KS)
(Sanjay Karol), J.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Madan Lal
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court