The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous at the hearing stage upon submission by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Cr.MP(M) No.19/2014 Decided on : February, 24, 2014 Nishant Thakur …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. M.L. Chauhan, Addl. A.G. and Mr. R.S. Verma, Addl. A.G.
Justice Sanjay Karol, J . (oral)
P.S.I. Ankur Sharma, Police Station, Kullu, District Kullu, is present alongwith record. Status report taken on record.
At this stage, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petition has become infructuous. As such, petition stands disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any.
February 24, 2014 (KS) (Sanjay Karol), J.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Nishant Thakur
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
