Kamlesh v. Bhupender Pal
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CR No.…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CR No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CR No. 35 of 2014
Date of Decision: 1.12.2014 Kamlesh & others …Petitioners Versus Bhupender Pal …Respondent ___________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):
Since the petitioners/tenants have handed over the possession to the landlord on 25.11.2014, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s) if any. No costs.
(Rajiv Sharma), Judge
December 1, 2014 (kalpana)
Kamlesh & others
Bhupender Pal
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court