Petitioner challenged seizure of his bus due to outstanding dues. The High Court noted that the State had recovered arrears and the bus was released. Finding nothing survived, the court disposed of the petition and pending applications.
The writ petition and pending applications were disposed; all other questions were left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 9677 of 2011-H.
Decided on: 11th June, 2013.
| Ram Partap. | … | Petitioner. |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| State of HP and ors. | … | Respondents |
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Varun Thakur, Advocate.
Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate, as amicus curiae.
For the Respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Romesh Verma, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General.
Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, C.J. (Oral)
which can be considered on its own merits, if and when required. We agree with the submission of the learned amicus curiae that the State having taken effective measures to recover the arrears, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any, leaving all other questions open. We acknowledge the able assistance given by the learned amicus curiae in this matter.
Dasti copy.
(A.M. Khanwilkar), Chief Justice.
11th June, 2013. (Kuldip Singh), (tr/vs) Judge.
Ram Partap
State of HP and ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
Kuldip Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
