The petitioner filed a writ petition which was disposed of on the terms of a previous Division Bench decision, HPSEB vs. Sumitra Devi, due to consent and waiver of notice.
Writ petition and pending applications dismissed on the terms of HPSEB vs. Sumita Devi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 3065 of 2013-G.
Decided on: 11th June, 2013.
Sudesh Kumari. … Petitioner. Versus HPSEB and ors. … Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Advocate.
Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, C.J. (Oral)
Heard counsel for the parties.
(A.M. Khanwilkar), Chief Justice. 11th June, 2013. (Kuldip Singh), (tr/vs) Judge.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
HPSEB and others vs. Sumitra DeviRelied on¶14
HPSEB and others vs. Sumitra Devi, LPA No. 92 of 2009
Sudesh Kumari
HPSEB
A.M. Khanwilkar
Kuldip Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
