A writ petition under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was filed by a petitioner against the respondents. The court dismissed the petition on the ground that it was withdrawn by the petitioner.
None; the petition was treated as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9427 of 2008
Date of Decision 4th September, 2012
Plant Engineer, HP State Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Ltd., Tutu, Shimla-12, presently working as Milk Plant Dagwar, Distt. Kangra HP ….Petitioner.
Versus
…..Respondents.
Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate.
For Respondents No. 1 to 4: None.
For Respondent No.5: Mr. P.K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General.
Dev Darshan Sud, J.(oral)
Learned counsel, Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, appearing for
the petitioner on instructions received from the petitioner
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
2
submits that the writ petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. It is ordered accordingly.
September 4th , 2012 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Plant Engineer, HP State Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Ltd.
The Board of Directors of HP State Milk Producer's Federation
Shri I.D. Moudgil
Shri S.S. Sood
Shri Bilyan
Registrar Cooperative Societies, HP
Dev Darshan Sud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
