Regular second appeal under CPC dismissed in absence of fee payment. The court noted the fee of the court guardian had not been paid and relied on a previous direction from January 7, 2009 to dismiss the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed due to non-payment of the fee of the court guardian.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA RSA No. 438 of 2006
Date of Decision 3rd September, 2012
Shri Biri Singh, son of Led Ram, resident of village Sarndha (Dogari), Illaqua Pandoh, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi HP ….Appellant.
Versus
….Proforma Respondents
Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J.
Whether approved for reporting?1
| __________________________ For the Appellant: |
________________________________ Mr. Pradeep Kumar Advocate. |
____ Sharma, |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent No.1: __________________________ |
Ms. Leena, Advocate vice Mr. G.R.Plasara, Advocate _______________________________ |
____ |
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
2
Dev Darshan Sud, J.(oral)
Fee of Court Guardian has not been paid. The appeal stands dismissed as directed by this Court on 7th January, 2009.
September 3rd , 2012 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge
Shri Biri Singh
Sh. Kamal Dev
Dev Darshan Sud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
