Lal Chand v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner in a Writ Petition was neither present nor represented; the High Court dismissed the petition and pending applications for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending applications dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP(T) No. 4613 of 2008 Decided on: 20.12.2010
Lal Chand Thakur
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
…Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 .
For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate Genera with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No. 1 .
None for respondent No.2.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lal Chand Thakur
- respondent
State of H.P.
Coram
Rajiv Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWPOA/4613/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court