Disposed
Shido Begum v. P.Mitra
Himachal Pradesh HCCOPC/336/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 336 of 2010 Decided on: 20.12.2010
Smt. Shido Begum
…Petitioners
Versus
P. Mitra and others.
…Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 . No
For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
None for respondent No. 3.
Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) :
Mr. P. M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has filed reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 in the Court. The same is permitted to be taken on record. It has come in the reply that in case the petitioner submits a fresh application for demarcation/correction in the revenue record, the same shall be considered within a reasonable period.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No
-2-
respondents shall carry out demarcation and in consequence thereto necessary corrections shall be carried out in the revenue records. The entire process shall be completed within a period of three months from today. Notices are discharged. No costs.
Copy dasti on usual terms.
(Rajiv Sharma), Judge
December 20, 2010
(K. Attri)
Smt. Shido Begum
P. Mitra and others
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court