High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of a writ petition by the placement of rival claims regarding work charge status and regularization, directing the competent authority to verify facts.
Direction to the competent authority to verify facts within one month and pass orders within four months. Pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 6988 of 2010.
Decided on: 8th November, 2010.
Shiv Kumar & others. .….. Petitioners.
Versus
State of H.P. & others. …. .. Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge.
For the petitioners : Ms. Madhu Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General.
Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
The petitioners claim work charge
status/regularization. Reliance is placed on the decision of this court in Man Singh vs. State of H.P. and others , CWP No.1594 of 2008 decided on 27th July, 2009.
2
judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s).
applications, if any.
Dasti copy.
(Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice
8th November, 2010 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Man Singh vs. State of H.P.Referred¶14
Man Singh vs. State of H.P. and others, CWP No.1594 of 2008 decided on 27th July, 2009
Shiv Kumar & others
State of H.P.
Kurian Joseph
V.K. Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Kurian Joseph and V.K. Ahuja
Parties & counsel
