The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed a review petition. Relying on the Supreme Court judgment and a prior Tribunal decision, the court found no error apparent on the face of the record and rejected the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
C. Rev.(T) No.: 5 of 2010.
Decided on: 10.11.2010.
State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Petitioners. Versus Rakesh Kumar. … Respondent.
Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the Respondent : None.
Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) :
Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has taken
the Court to the judgment dated 22nd May, 2006 rendered by erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others, O.A. No.209 of 2005 . The judgment is based on the basis of judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhaya vs. State of H.P. and others. There is no error apparent on the face of record. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 10, 2010. (sck).
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and othersExplained¶7
Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others, O.A. No.209 of 2005
Mool Raj Upadhaya vs. State of H.P. and othersExplained¶7
Mool Raj Upadhaya vs. State of H.P. and others
State of Himachal Pradesh
Rakesh Kumar
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
