The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed a review petition filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh against a judgment of the Administrative Tribunal, relying on a Supreme Court decision. The court found no error apparent on the face of the record.
The review petition and any pending applications are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
C. Rev.(T) No.: 6 of 2010.
Decided on: 10.11.2010.
State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Petitioners. Versus Jiwan Singh. … Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the Respondent : None.
Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) :
Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has taken
the Court to the judgment dated 23rd March, 2006 rendered by erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in Jiwan Singh versus State of H.P. and others, O.A. (D) No.82 of 2006 . The judgment is based on the basis of judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhaya vs. State of H.P. and others. There is no error apparent on the face of record. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 10, 2010. (sck).
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State of Himachal Pradesh's request for dismissal of the review petition is accepted in light of the Administrative Tribunal's judgment.
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Jiwan Singh
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
