High Court of Himachal Pradesh dispensed with hearing as respondent undertook to regularise petitioner within three months, with no precedent value for future cases. Petition closed.
Petitioner to be regularised as undertaken by respondent within three months without it being a precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
COPC No.: 206 of 2010. Decided on: 05.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rajesh Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus R.K. Gupta. … Respondent/Contemnor. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent/ Contemnor. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate.
Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral):
Mr. R.K. Gupta (respondent), Managing Director, H.P. State Forest Corporation is present in Court. Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the respondent, on the basis of instructions imparted to her by Mr. R.K. Gupta, undertakes to regularise the services of the petitioner, within a period of three months from today. However, she prays that it may not be construed as precedent for future.
(Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 05, 2010. (sck).
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be regularised in service as undertaken by the respondent.
Rajesh Kumar
R.K. Gupta
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
