In a special civil application, the petitioner sought refund. The Court observed that the refund had already been granted. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as not survived, and interim relief was vacated.
Notice discharged; interim relief vacated; petition disposed of as not survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/8040/2022 ORDER DATED: 19/10/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8040 of 2022
==========================================================
CHANDUBHAI BHAGWANDAS PATEL
Versus UNION OF INDIA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HIRAK R SHAH(12499) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR UTKARSH R SHARMA(6157) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 19/10/2022 ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr. Hirak Shah for the petitioner stated that the respondent-authority has already granted the refund and in that view the cause for prosecuting this petition does not survive.
In view of his statement and subsequent development of granting of refund, the petition is disposed of as not survived. Notice is discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(N.V.ANJARIA, J)
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
JYOTI V. JANI
Page 1 of 1
Chandubhai Bhagandas Patel
Union of India
N.V.Anjaria
Bhargav D. Karia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
