The High Court of Gujarat disposed of a special civil application as not surviving. The petitioner's advocate stated that the cause of action no longer existed due to the subsequent sanctioning of a refund amount by the competent authority.
Notice is discharged. The petition is disposed of as not surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/5488/2021 ORDER DATED: 19/10/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5488 of 2021
==========================================================
M/S BLOCK SHRINKHALA TECHNOLOGIES LLP
Versus UNION OF INDIA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ANAND NAINAWATI(5970) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR. KRUTIK PARIKH, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR NIKUNT K RAVAL(5558) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 19/10/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr. Anand Nainawati for the petitioner stated that in view of the subsequent development of sanctioning of the refund amount by the competent authority, the cause to prosecute this petition does not survive.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as not surviving. Notice is discharged.
(N.V.ANJARIA, J)
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
C.M. JOSHI
Page 1 of 1
M/S. Block Shrinkhala Technologies LLP
Union of India
N.V. Anjaria
Bhargav D. Karia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
