Petitioner approached the High Court seeking mutation entry. Post-filing, the entry was posted in the revenue record. Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition as the grievance no longer subsisted and disposed of the matter.
Permission granted to withdraw writ petition; matter disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/6015/2022 ORDER DATED: 15/06/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6015 of 2022
==========================================================
BHARATBHAI MANUBHAI PRAJAPATI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS TRUSHA K PATEL(2434) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4 for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR JK SHAH, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 15/06/2022 ORAL ORDER
Today, Ms Trusha K. Patel, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners has placed on record the extracts of village form no.7. It is stated that the entry which the petitioners were requesting for mutation, has now been posted in the revenue record. In view of the said development, Ms Patel, learned advocate, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition, as the grievance does not survive.
Request is acceded to. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
(SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J)
BINOY B PILLAI
Page 1 of 1
Bharatbhai Manubhai Prajapati
State of Gujarat
Sangeeta K. Vishen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
