Petitioner sought withdrawal of a Writ Petition challenging a Tribunal order. The Court granted permission to withdraw the petition.
Permission to withdraw the Special Civil Application No. 16164/2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/16164/2021 ORDER DATED: 15/06/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16164 of 2021
==========================================================
HARSHIT INDRAVADAN TALATI
Versus
GUJARAT REVENUE TRIBUNAL
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. ZALAK B PIPALIA(6161) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2 MR JK SHAH, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 4 APPEARANCE DELETED for the Respondent(s) No. 2 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3,4
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN Date : 15/06/2022 ORAL ORDER
Mr Anshin H. Desai, learned Senior Advocate with Mr Zalak B. Pipalia, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, drew the attention of this Court to the order dated 11.4.2022 wherein, this Court has directed the Registry not to show the name of the partyin-person as Mrs. Tewar and she was allowed to be represented through an advocate. Though she was permitted to represent her case through an advocate; till date, she has not engaged a lawyer and she continues to appear as a party-in-person, which cannot be permitted in view of the order dated 11.4.2022.
Page 1 of 2
C/SCA/16164/2021 ORDER DATED: 15/06/2022
(SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J)
BINOY B PILLAI
Page 2 of 2
HARSHIT INDRAVADAN TALATI
GUJARAT REVENUE TRIBUNAL
SANGEETA K. VISHEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
