Bench permitted withdrawal of Special Civil Application regarding banking dispute with liberty to pursue remedy before DRT-II.
Permission to withdraw Special Civil Application with liberty to pursue remedy before DRT-II.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/5589/2020 ORDER DATED: 13/07/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5589 of 2020
==========================================================
HARSUKHBHAI PARBATBHAI LAKKAD
Versus
AUTHORISED OFFICER, BANK OF BARODA (ERSTWHILE DENA BANK)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS BHAVNA V SHAH(11047) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4 MS MOHINI K SHAH(775) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4 DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4 MR NR PARIKH(578) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Date : 13/07/2022
ORAL ORDER
Mr. Vishwas K Shah, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to pursue the remedy available before the DRT-II wherein Securitization Application No.155 of 2016 is pending for adjudication. It is open for the learned advocates for the respective parties to raise all the contentions which are available under the law. Permission, as sought for, is granted. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with above liberty. Notice discharged.
(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J)
KAUSHIK J. RATHOD
Page 1 of 1
HARSUKHBHAI PARBATBHAI LAKKAD
AUTHORISED OFFICER, BANK OF BARODA
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
KAUSHIK J. RATHOD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
