The High Court of Gujarat granted the petitioner permission to withdraw the special civil application (writ petition) citing availability of statutory remedy. The application was disposed of as withdrawn; merits were not assessed.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/4485/2021 ORDER DATED: 13/07/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4485 of 2021
=====================================================
AYAKHAN KARIMKHAN BALOCH
Versus
HDFC BANK LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER HIREN
DEVENDRAPRASAD SHUKLA
=====================================================
Appearance:
MR VISHAL B MEHTA(5319) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2
DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR VISHWAS K SHAH(5364) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=====================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Date : 13/07/2022
ORAL ORDER
Mr. Vishal Mehta, the learned advocate appearing
for the writ applicants on instructions of his
clients seeks permission to withdraw the present writ
application to avail statutory remedy available under
the law.
Permission as prayed for is granted. The present
writ application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Notice is discharged.
It is clarified that this Court has otherwise
not assessed the merits of the matter.
(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J)
Pallavi
Page 1 of 1
Ayakhan Karimkhan Baloch
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court