In an oral order, the Gujarat High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the special civil application to enable it to pursue an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, without addressing the merits.
Permission granted to withdraw the special civil application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/1807/2022 ORDER DATED: 21/02/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1807 of 2022
==========================================================
GALLOPS AUTOMOTIVE PVT LTD THROUGH RAJKUMAR DHARAMCHAND PUGALIA
Versus
DEUTSCHE BANK AG THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR PARTH D PATEL(9754) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 NIRALI Y OZA(8643) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 21/02/2022 ORAL ORDER
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
JYOTI V. JANI
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the special civil application to pursue an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
GALLOPS AUTOMOTIVE PVT LTD THROUGH RAJKUMAR DHARAMCHAND PUGALIA
DEUTSCHE BANK AG THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER
BHARGAV D. KARIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
