Special civil application challenging electricity tower installation and cable laying was dismissed as rejected prayers since the works were already completed and in operation.
The writ petitions were not entertained and stood rejected due to subsequent development.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/10902/2021 ORDER DATED: 04/07/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10902 of 2021 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2022 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10902 of 2021 With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10646 of 2021 With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2022 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10646 of 2021
==========================================================
SHREEM INFRACON THROUGH PARTNER MOHAN BHAGWAT PUROHIT
AGRAWAL
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
DHRUVIK K PATEL(7769) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR SAHIL TRIVEDI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR SALIL M THAKORE(5821) for the Respondent(s) No. 3 MR SP HASURKAR(345) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 4
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
Date : 04/07/2022 COMMON ORAL ORDER
The matters were kept at the top of the board
however, learned advocate Mr.Patel has chosen not
to remain present before this Court.
1.The writ petitions are filed inter alia for
the following prayers:
“8A. YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of
mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or
direction in the nature of mandamus to respondent
no.2 GETCO to consider installing underground EHT
cable laying of 220 KV underground electrical cable
of 1200 sq. mm for the said purpose as the up
gradation of 132 KV line to 220 KV lin same being the
illegal, discriminating and arbitrary;
B. YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to Issue an appropriate,
writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to
Page 1 of 2
C/SCA/10902/2021 ORDER DATED: 04/07/2022
the respondent no.2 directing not laying of 220 KV
over the property of the petitioner;”
2. Learned advocates for the respective parties have submitted that in fact the work of laying down the electric towers as well as cables is already completed and so far as the work of underground electric cables is concerned, the same is in operation.
3. Under the circumstances, the prayers made in the writ petitions cannot be entertained. Hence, the present writ petitions stand rejected in view of the subsequent development. Notice is discharged.
4. As a sequel, the connected civil applications also stand disposed of.
5. Registry to place a copy of this order in each of the connected matters.
NVMEWADA
Page 2 of 2
Shreem Infracon Through Partner Mohan Bhagwat Purohit AgRAWAL
State of Gujarat
GETCO
A.S. Supehia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court