An oral order closing contempt proceedings upon an undertaking by the Advocate General to remit the disputed amount during the day, reviving the petition if payment is not made.
Contempt proceedings stood closed upon undertaking to remit payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/448/2022 ORDER DATED: 02/09/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 448 of 2022 In
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 23115 of 2019
==================================================
MUSTUFA USMANBHAI MANSURI
Versus
TRUPTIBEN A DESAI, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR (I/C) AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR
================================================== Appearance:
MR. NISHIT P GANDHI(6946) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2
==================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
Date : 02/09/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR)
Mr. K.M. Antani, learned AGP states that the payment would be made during the course of the day by remitting the said amount to the account of the appellant. His submission and undertaking is placed on record. Reserving liberty to the applicant to revive the contempt petition in the event of the amount not being credited as undertaken by the learned AGP appearing for the State, contempt proceeding stands closed.
(ARAVIND KUMAR,CJ)
(ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J)
Bharat
Page 1 of 1
Mustufa Usmanbhai Mansuri
Truptiben A Desai
Aravind Kumar
Ashutosh J. Shastri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
