High Court at Ahmedabad disposed of a special criminal application as not survived because the corpus (Savitaben Kachrabhai Patel) had expired. The court directed the appellants to take legal recourse via their FIR if the death was unnatural.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/SCR.A/12662/2021 ORDER DATED: 20/12/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 12662 of 2021
==========================================================
LATABEN W/O NARENDRA BHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR PB GOSWAMI(3377) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5 MS JIRGA JHAVERI, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Date : 20/12/2021
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA)
Learned advocate Mr. PB Goswami for the petitioner, upon instructions of petitioner Nos.1 and 5, states at bar that corpus Savitaben Kachrabhai Patel is no more and she had expired. In light of the statement made at bar, present petition would not survive, as the corpus is no more. The petitioners are at liberty to take legal recourse pursuant to their FIR annexed at Annexure A1 to the present petition if the corpus is died unnaturally. With this, present petition stands disposed of as not survived.
(S.H.VORA, J)
(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.)
SHEKHAR P. BARVE
Page 1 of 1
LATABEN W/O NARENDRA BHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL
STATE OF GUJARAT
S.H. VORA
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
