In a consumer application under the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding alleged illegal confinement, the High Court held that the accused woman voluntarily left her husband. Consequently, the bench set the corpus free and disposed of the application.
Corpus set free and petition disposed of; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/SCR.A/9399/2021 ORDER DATED: 17/12/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 9399 of 2021
==========================================================
DHARMENDRASINH JAGATSINH SOLANKI
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
KUMAR H TRIVEDI(9364) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR PAWAN A BAROT(6455) for the Respondent(s) No. 4 NOTICE SERVED(4) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 NOTICE UNSERVED(8) for the Respondent(s) No. 3,5 MS MOXA THAKKAR, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Date : 17/12/2021
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA)
Page 1 of 2
R/SCR.A/9399/2021 ORDER DATED: 17/12/2021
(S.H.VORA, J)
(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.)
SHEKHAR P. BARVE
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent No. 5 was in illegal confinement or abducted by the petitioner.
Dharmendrasinh Jagatsinh Solanki
State of Gujarat
Jayaben
S.H. Vora
Aniruddha P. Mayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
