High Court disposed of special civil application as withdrawn. Court directed Respondent No. 2 to decide any pending stay application regarding notices from Respondent No. 4 within one week of filing.
Petition disposed as withdrawn; direction issued to decide stay application within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/3515/2021 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3515 of 2021
======================================================= INOX WIND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LTD
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
=======================================================
Appearance:
MR KAMLESH P VAIDANKAR(10135) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 NILU K VAIDANKAR(8382) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4 MR KRUTIK PARIKH AGP (99) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 22/02/2021
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard Mr. Kamlesh P. Vaidankar, learned advocate for
the petitioner and Mr. Krutik Parikh, learned AGP for the respondent No.1.
seeks permission to withdraw present petition with liberty to approach respondent No.2 with an application for stay of the notices dated 21.12.2020 and 02.01.2021 issued by the respondent No.4. However, he urges that the respondent No.2 may be directed to decide the application expeditiously within stipulated time limit.
Page 1 of 2
C/SCA/3515/2021 ORDER
It is clarified that this Court has not examined the
merits of the case.
(A.G.URAIZEE, J)
SURESH SOLANKI
Page 2 of 2
INOX WIND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LTD
STATE OF GUJARAT
A.G. URAIZEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
