Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedy. The request was acceded to and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/18937/2021 ORDER DATED: 21/12/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18937 of 2021
==========================================================
KETANKUMAR KANTILAL PATEL
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KRISHNARAJSINH D CHAUHAN(10648) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR VASANT R BAROT(5746) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4
ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP(99) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR KRUTIK PARIKH, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN
Date : 21/12/2021
ORAL ORDER
Mr. Vasant Barot, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to pursue the appropriate remedy.
Request is acceded to. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J)
SINDHU NAIR
Page 1 of 1
KETANKUMAR KANTILAL PATEL
STATE OF GUJARAT
SANGEETA K. VISHEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
