This short oral order disposes of a special civil application challenging an order of detention, finding the petition infructuous as the detention order has already been revoked by the competent authority.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/8348/2020 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8348 of 2020
========================================================== VALA MAHIPATBHAI JILUBHAI THROUGH HIS COUSIN BROTHER VALA HARESHBHAI BHIMABHAI
Versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. NISARG D SHAH(7299) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS MEGHA CHITALIYA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 2 RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
Date : 02/12/2020
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Nisarg D. Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner, has, at the outset, submitted that the order of detention dated 7.7.2020 is already revoked by the competent authority and as such, this petition has become infructuous.
In view of above statement being made by Mr.Nisarg D. Shah, learned advocate, under the instructions, the present petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged.
(ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J)
NAIR SMITA V.
Page 1 of 1
Vala Mahipatbhai Jilubhai Through His Cousin Brother Vala Hareshbhai Bhimabhai
District Magistrate
Ashutosh J. Shastri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
