Disposed
Deepak Mangalbhai Kamble v. State of Gujarat
Gujarat HCSCA/14268/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/14268/2020 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14268 of 2020
=========================================================
DEEPAK MANGALBHAI KAMBLE
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
=========================================================
Appearance:
KAUSHAL S JANI(7627) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR BHARAT VYAS ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
=========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
Date : 16/12/2020
ORAL ORDER
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to change the name of the son of the present petitioner from Deep to Deepansh in the birth certificate issued by the respondent no. 2.
(C) Your Lordships may further be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to correct or change the name of the son of the petitioner from Deep to Deepansh and to issue Birth Certificate with corrected name as Deepansh to the petitioner in the interest of justice.
(D) Any other relief that may be deemed just and proper may also be kindly granted.”
Page 1 of 2
C/SCA/14268/2020 ORDER
petitioner to make an application before the competent authority for the grievance raised in the petition by presenting all the relevant decisions related to the issue and the petitioner would like to make such application within a period of ten days from today and has requested that the same may be directed to be decided at the earliest.
3.1. As and when such application is made and received by the authority, the same shall be examined, considered and be decided in accordance with law, on the basis of its own merits as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such application. It is needless to say that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merit with regard to any of the contention of the petition and it is independently left open for the authority to take decision in accordance with law. However, if the decision is adverse to the petitioner, it would also be permissible for the petitioner to challenge the same before the appropriate forum.
(ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J)
NAIR SMITA V.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can be permitted to file an application before the competent authority for correction of the birth certificate name against the processor that the competent authority.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Mangalbhai Kamble
State of Gujarat
Ashutosh J. Shastri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court