The applicant withdrew the writ petition seeking writ under Articles 226 and 227, simultaneously withdrawing the condonation application and revision application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/CA/1229/2020 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1229 of 2020
In F/CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 8581 of 2020
==========================================================
AZA INFRASPACE (INDIA) PVT. LIMITED
Versus MUSTAFA TAHERALI SASSA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MM SAIYED(1806) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5 for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.UDHWANI
Date : 04/03/2020 ORAL ORDER
In order to file a writ petition under Articles
226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the learned
counsel for the applicants withdraws the Civil
Application seeking condonation of delay and
consequently the Civil Revision Application as well.
Accordingly, both the proceedings are disposed
of as withdrawn with a liberty as above.
The certified copies of the papers as may be
replaced by the photocopies, shall be returned to the
applicants.
(G.R.UDHWANI, J)
BDSONGARA
Page 1 of 1
AZA INFRASPACE (INDIA) PVT. LIMITED
MUSTAFA TAHERALI SASSA
G.R.UDHWANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court