The Special Civil Application was disposed of in favor of the petitioner. The Court granted permission to withdraw the petition and noted that withdrawal does not preclude seeking expedited hearing of the main civil suit.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/9059/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9059 of 2019
=============================================== DIPAKGIRI BHAGVANGIRI GOSWAMI
Versus
JAYANTILAL MULJI BHIMANI
===============================================
Appearance :
MR B U MODI(6069) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR SAVAN N PANDYA(5600) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
===============================================
CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI
Date : 10/05/2019
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Permission, as sought for, is hereby granted. The present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
However, this withdrawal of petition would not come in the way of petitioner to request the concerned learned Judge for expeditious hearing of the main civil suit.
(A.J. SHASTRI, J)
DHARMENDRA KUMAR
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DIPAK GIRI BHAGVANGIRI GOSWAMI
JAYANTILAL MULJI BHIMANI
A.J. SHASTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
