An order was disposed of as infructuous because the detention order was already revoked on the advice of the Advisory Board.
Rule discharged; petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/730/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 730 of 2019
======================================
MAHESHBHAI NARANBHAI PAWAR (RAJPUT) THROUGH WIFE VARSHA MAHESH PAWAR (RAJPUT) Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & 2 other(s)
======================================
Appearance:
MR PARTHIV A BHATT(5331) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR SHIRISH GOHIL, ASSITANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER (65) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
======================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH A. TRIVEDI
Date : 05/03/2019
ORAL ORDER
Shri Parthiv Bhatt, learned advocate for the petitioner, states that since the order of detention is revoked on the advice of the Advisory Board, this petition has become infructuous. The present petition stands disposed of as it has become infructuous. Rule is discharged.
(UMESH A. TRIVEDI, J.)
siji
Page 1 of 1
MAHESHBHAI NARANBHAI PAWAR (RAJPUT) THROUGH WIFE VARSHA MAHESH PAWAR (RAJPUT)
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
UMESH A. TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
