This oral order records that the appellants, via their counsel, requested withdrawal of the Second Appeal due to settlement outside court. The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn. No other substantive decision or legal proposition is provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SA/222/2014 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 222 of 2014
======================================
BISMILLAKHAN KAMALKHAN PARMAR & 1 other(s)
Versus
NASARKHAN PAHADKHAN PARMAR-DECD. & 5 other(s) ====================================== Appearance:
MR. D. P. KINARIWALA(410) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2 MR. R.D.KINARIWALA(6146) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2 DELETED(20) for the Respondent(s) No. 6
MR HIMANSU M PADHYA(1611) for the Respondent(s) No. 1.1,1.2,1.3
RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5
======================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH A. TRIVEDI
Date : 01/03/2019
ORAL ORDER
Shri R.D. Kinariwala, learned advocate for the appellants, places on record the communication addressed to him by his clients informing him that since the matter is settled between the parties outside the court they request him to withdraw the said Second Appeal. The communication produced by the learned advocate for the appellants is taken on record.
Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
The present Second Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(UMESH A. TRIVEDI, J.)
siji
Page 1 of 1
BISMILLAKHAN KAMALKHAN PARMAR
NASARKHAN PAHADKHAN PARMAR-DECD.
UMESH A. TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
