A special civil application was disposed of as infructuous after the learned Additional General Public Prosecutor stated that the competent authority had revoked the order of detention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/6975/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6975 of 2019
=========================================================== RAJULAL S/O BHAVARLAL MEVADA THRU HIS WIFE SANGITA KUMARI W/O RAJULAL BHAVARLAL MEVADA
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
JAYDEEP H SINDHI(9585) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (R)(71) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2 MR. ROHAN N. SHAH, AGP,(1) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
Date : 20/08/2019 ORAL ORDER
Learned A.G.P. makes a statement at the bar that the competent authority has revoked the order of detention and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged.
(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
SIDDHARTH
Page 1 of 1
RAJULAL S/O BHAVARLAL MEVADA THRU HIS WIFE SANGITA KUMARI
STATE OF GUJARAT
A.Y. Kogje
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
