The High Court of Gujarat dismissed a civil contempt application proceedings based on a Division Bench judgment that was subsequently stayed by the Supreme Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/1021/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1021 of 2019 In
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1486 of 2017
=========================================================
PWD AND FOREST EMPLOYEES UNION
Versus J.N.SINGH
========================================================= Appearance:
MS ADITI RAOL, ADVOCATE for MS VIDHI J BHATT(6155) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4 for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2,3,4
=========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI
Date : 15/11/2019
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH)
Ms. Aditi Raol, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. Vidhi J. Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicants states that after filing of the contempt application, the applicants have come to know that the judgment of the Division Bench dated 30.04.2019 non compliance of which is alleged in the Civil Contempt Application as has been since stayed by the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.- 18744 to 18746 of 2019 vide order dated 13.08.2019. A copy of the order passed by
Page 1 of 2
C/MCA/1021/2019 ORDER
the Apex Court is placed on record.
In the circumstances, we dismiss this contempt application
at this stage leaving it open to the applicants to apply again in case the applicants succeed before the Apex Court,
(VIKRAM NATH, CJ)
(A.J. SHASTRI, J)
/phalguni/
Page 2 of 2
PWD AND FOREST EMPLOYEES UNION
J.N.SINGH
Vikram Nath
A.J. Shastri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
