mechanical manner. That, the claimant has deposed vide Exh.48, due to amputation of leg, he was unable to do the business of scrap goods and agricultural operations. It is further submitted that considering the injuries sustained by the claimant, amount of prospective rise was required to be considered by the tribunal. That, the tribunal has committed an error in considering the income of the claimant at Rs.1500 per month without considering the prospective rise in furture income. That, the claimant has produced village form No.8-A and 7/12 abstracts vide Exh.54 and 55 of land bearing Revenue Survey No.820/1 of Prabhas Patan. That, his income from business as well as agriculture work was around Rs.5000/- per month as has owned 6 vighas of land. That, on account of medical treatment, the tribunal has committed an error in not considering the bills produced on record vide Exh.48. That, the tribunal ought to have appreciated the fact that the opponents have not led any evidence to disprove the version of the claimant, or to establish contrary facts. That, amount of actual loss of Income was erroneously considered by the tribunal for a period of two months rest. That, it is because of amputation, the claimant was required to take rest for a longer period and therefore, great actual loss was suffered by the claimant. That, on account of pain, shock and
