The High Court of Gujarat allowed the appellant to withdraw criminal appeal No. 57 of 2019 and dismissed it as withdrawn upon the leave of the court.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.A/57/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 57 of 2019
==========================================================
SATYAM ASHOKBHAI PANDEY
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
========================================================== Appearance:
MR D. H. RATHORE for MEHUL A SURATI(7870) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
KARTIKKUMAR K JOSHI(8042) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2 MS KRINA CALLA, APP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 25/01/2019
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate Mr. D. H. Rathore for Mr. Mehul A. Surati, learned advocate for the appellant does not press this appeal and seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal.
Permission; as prayed for is granted. The appeal stands
dismissed as withdrawn. Notice discharged.
(B.N. KARIA, J)
ksdarji
Page 1 of 1
Mehul A Surati
State of Gujarat
B.N. KARIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
