Petitioner sought withdrawal of a special civil application regarding detention after the Assistant Government Pleader confirmed no proposal to detain. The High Court allowed withdrawal, disposed the petition accordingly, and discharged notice.
Petition withdrawn and disposed; notice discharged; direct service permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/8457/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8457 of 2018
============================================= SUNIL RAMDAS MARATHI(MADRASI)
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
=============================================
Appearance:
MR MR PRAJAPATI(1532) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(11) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
=============================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 07/06/2018
ORAL ORDER
Dr. Venugopal Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader places on record a communication and states that there is no proposal to detain the petitioner.
In view of this communication, learned counsel Mr. M.R. Prajapati for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Notice is discharged.
Direct service today is permitted.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J.)
Dolly
Page 1 of 1
Sunil Ramdas Marathi(Madrasi)
State of Gujarat
Biren Vaishnav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
