Petitioner sought withdrawal of special civil application following confirmation from respondent that detention was no longer proposed than petition disposed as withdrawn.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/8155/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8155 of 2018
=============================================
SUNILBHAI RAMJIBHAI PATEL
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
============================================= Appearance:
MR GAJENDRA P BAGHEL(2968) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP(99) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3 =============================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 07/06/2018
ORAL ORDER
Dr. Venugopal Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader places on record communication dated 06.06.2018 and states that there is no proposal to detain the petitioner.
In view of this communication, learned counsel Mr. G.P. Baghel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Notice is discharged.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J.)
Dolly
Page 1 of 1
SUNILBHAI RAMJIBHAI PATEL
STATE OF GUJARAT
BIREN VAISHNAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
