The application was dismissed as not pressed because the petitioner informed the court that the respondents had complied with previous directions by making the necessary payment.
Application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/676/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 676 of 2018
==========================================================
BHAGUJI NATHUJI MARVADI DCED L H RATANBEN WD/O BHAGUJI NATHUJI MARVADI
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR CB DASTOOR(238) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 16/07/2018 ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY)
It is represented by learned counsel for the
applicant that during the pendency of this
application, the respondents have complied with the
directions issued by the learned single Judge and
necessary payment has been made, which has been
received by the applicant. In above view of the
matter, learned counsel for the applicant does not
want to pursue the matter further. Hence, the
application is dismissed as not pressed.
(R.SUBHASH REDDY, CJ)
(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
PRAVIN KARUNAN
Page 1 of 1
BHAGUJI NATHUJI MARVADI
STATE OF GUJARAT
R.SUBHASH REDDY
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court