The High Court dismissed the pending miscellaneous civil application as not pressed, noting that the respondents had complied with prior directions during its pendency. Notice was discharged.
Notice was discharged and the application was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/568/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 568 of 2018
==========================================================
FARID AHMED MOHAMMEDBHAI NAGORI
Versus M THENNARASAN COMMISSIONER
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR K I KAZI(5030) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR KAUSHAL D PANDYA(2905) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 12/07/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY)
It is represented by the learned counsel
appearing for theapplicant that during the
pendency of this application, as the respondents have
already complied with the directions, he is
instructed not pursue the matter. In view of such
submission, this application is dismissed as not
pressed. Notice is discharged.
(R.SUBHASH REDDY, CJ)
(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
RADHAKRISHNAN K.V.
Page 1 of 1
FARID AHMED MOHAMMEDBHAI NAGORI
M THENNARASAN
MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court