This court rejected a criminal revision application filed by the original complainant challenging a bail order and refusal of remand. The court upheld the trial court's view that remand was unnecessary as FIR facts were sufficient for investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.RA/1161/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1161 of 2018
==========================================================
JAY JAYANTKUMAR PANDYA
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. YOGENDRA THAKORE(3975) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2 MR KL PANDYA ADDITONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.UDHWANI
Date : 29/11/2018
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 2
R/CR.RA/1161/2018 ORDER
Pertinently, the State so far has not shown any interest to challenge the denial of remand and grant of bail to respondent no.2. It is the original complainant who has come forward with the said challenge.
(G.R.UDHWANI, J)
niru*
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision application challenging the denial of remand and grant of bail to the respondent has any substance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JAY JAYANTKUMAR PANDYA
STATE OF GUJARAT
KL PANDYA
G.R.UDHWANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
